top of page
The Strategy eXecution Forum logo

🏎️ Same Wall, New Paint Job 🧱- One Size Fits All Methodology Strategy Execution

Writer: Ben Chamberlain
Ben Chamberlain
7 days ago
2 min read

Watch the confidence on that kart. Sunglasses on, banner flying, "New Methodology, 2026, The Answer to Everything" flapping proudly in the wind. Nobody's looking at the wall dead ahead, the one with three identical plaques already mounted on it, Waterfall, Agile, Project to Product, each one also promising to be "The Answer to Everything" when it launched. Same wall. Same scuff marks. Every few years, a different name gets painted on the flag, and the organization races toward it with the exact same enthusiasm it had the last three times, right up until it hits.


Cartoon of five executives cheering in a go-kart racing toward a scarred concrete wall, with retired plaques for Waterfall 1995 to 2010, Agile 2010 to 2020, and Project to Product 2020 to 2025, each labeled "The Answer to Everything," while a banner on the kart reads "New Methodology, 2026, The Answer to Everything

Industry analysts, consulting firms, and product companies all have a role in this cycle, positioning a new way of working every few years, often with genuine merit behind the shift. That's not the part worth pushing back on. The part worth pushing back on is the assumption that adopting the new methodology, by itself, is what fixes execution. It rarely does. Waterfall produced real, genuine change when it arrived. So did Agile. So did Project to Product. Each one shifted the rhythm, the vocabulary, the ceremonies, and each one still left the underlying execution gap standing, because the methodology was never really the thing that was broken.


There is no such thing as a one size fits all methodology for strategy execution. Strategy Execution has to be personalized to each organization's specific culture, politics, and history, and even within a single organization, different teams often genuinely need different execution methodologies suited to how they actually work, some agile, some more structured, some somewhere in between. A single enforced framework rolled out top down doesn't solve that. It just becomes the next plaque on the wall in a few years.


The 10 Key Principles to Master Strategy Execution aren't something we came up with on our own. They're being defined in the open by the StrategyXF community, multi disciplinary leaders and practitioners from Strategy, Operations, Finance, HR, Architecture, Transformation, PMO, Delivery, and Change Management, coming together to name the real challenges holding organizations back from mastering Strategy Execution, and to share what's actually worked. This scene came directly from that conversation.


 How many "next big methodologies" has your organization adopted in the last decade, and how many of them actually closed the execution gap they promised to fix?👇 



StrategyXF Painfully Accurate Series (Sad, but True!)

This cartoon is part of Painfully Accurate, a StrategyXF series built from real Strategy Execution challenges our members have actually lived through, laughed about, and found a way past.

StrategyXF Painfully Accurate Series (Sad, but True!)

This cartoon is part of Painfully Accurate, a StrategyXF series built from real Strategy Execution challenges our members have actually lived through, laughed about, and found a way past.


Every scene started as something a leader or practitioner described, not a hypothetical, an actual moment somebody in this community said out loud and everyone else in the room recognized instantly. Sad but true, every one of them, and every one of them survivable.


If any of this feels a little too familiar, you're exactly who this community was built for. Join StrategyXF and help us turn these shared war stories into the practical, personalized strategies that finally put them behind us.


 
 
bottom of page